AgentClash

Framework

An agent evaluation framework built for production tasks

Teams comparing agent evaluation frameworks should look past leaderboard scores. AgentClash gives you repeatable workloads, same-task eval runs, replay evidence, and release gates you can audit in git.

live eval
gate: pass

Candidate

92correct patch, low cost

Baseline

88stable reference run

Control

73missed edge case

replay timeline

1loaded task inputs and tool policy
2ran sandbox actions and captured artifacts
3scored trajectory and validator evidence
4attached scorecard and release verdict

ci verdict

Candidate clears release gate

Correctness improved, latency within budget, and required artifacts were preserved for review.

agentclash run create --follow

What a serious framework includes

Built for reviewable agent decisions

A useful agent evaluation framework packages tasks, enforces fair constraints, scores trajectories, and makes failures reusable.

OpenTelemetry-compatible trace import

Pinned datasets and golden test cases

Baseline versus candidate regression checks

Replay trails for tool calls, outputs, and artifacts

Scorecards for correctness, cost, latency, and evidence

CI gates for prompt, model, RAG, and tool changes

Workflow

Framework workflow

Import the evidence

Start from OpenTelemetry traces, curated datasets, support transcripts, or a real failure your team already saw.

Pin the baseline

Record the current accepted behavior so every prompt, model, RAG, or tool change has a fair comparison point.

Replay the evidence

Inspect tool calls, outputs, artifacts, latency, cost, and judge evidence when a candidate gets worse.

Gate the release

Compare candidate and baseline runs, then fail CI before a regression reaches users.

FAQ

Framework comparison FAQ

How is AgentClash different from prompt-evaluation frameworks?

Prompt-evaluation frameworks score isolated model outputs. AgentClash is an agent-evaluation framework for multi-turn tool-using runs in a sandbox.

Can we compare AgentClash with other tools?

Yes. See the compare hub for side-by-side notes with Braintrust, LangSmith, Promptfoo, Langfuse, Arize Phoenix, and OpenAI Evals.

Does the framework support custom scoring?

Yes. Challenge packs carry scoring rules, validators, and judge configuration so teams can encode domain-specific pass conditions.